Anesthesiology Performance Improvement and Reporting Exchange (ASPIRE)
Pediatric Subcommittee Meeting Minutes June 26, 2023
Attendance:
Amber Franz, Seattle Children’s
Lucy Everett, MGH
Andrew Zittleman, MPOG
Meridith Wade, MPOG
Ben Andrew, Duke Children’s
Morgan Brown, Boston Children’s
Bishr Haydar, Univ. of Michigan
Nicole Barrios, MPOG
Brad Taicher, Duke Children’s
Nirav Shah, MPOG
Chuck Schrock, St. Louis Children’s
Rahul Koka, Johns Hopkins
Diana O’Dell, MPOG
RK Ramamurthi, Lucile Packard Children’s
Ellen Wang, Lucile Packard Children’s
Ruchika Gupta, Univ. of Michigan
Eva Lu-Boettcher, Univ. Wisconsin
Ruchik Sharma, Univ. of Virginia
Frances Guida Smiatacz, MPOG
Ruth Cassidy, MPOG
Jacques Scharoun, Weill Cornell
Ryan Bradstreet, Bronson Kalamazoo
James Xie,Lucile Packard Children’s
Sushma Vallamkonda, MPOG
Kate Buehler, MPOG
Tiffany Malenfant, MPOG
Kelly Everhart, Dartmouth Hitchcock
Vikas O’Reilly-Shah, Seattle’s Childrens
Kim Taylor, Univ. of Michigan
Yuan Yuan, MPOG
Meeting Summary
Minutes from March 7, 2023 meeting approved - minutes and recording posted on the MPOG website
for review
Announcements
Sustainability Toolkit available on MPOG Website
Thank you to Dr. Eva Lu-Boettcher for adding the pediatric sections!
SUS-06 Measure Released!
Description: Percentage of pediatric cases with a max fresh gas flow (FGF) equal to or
less than a weight-based threshold during the induction phase of anesthesia.
Measure is available on the sustainability and pediatric dashboard now. Please view the
measure specification for more information
See slides for anonymized institution performance
James Xie (Stanford): We changed all our machine FGF defaults to 3L/min since the last
meeting
👍
Call for Measure Reviewers
PAIN-01-Peds: Multimodal Analgesia, Pediatrics
Initial measure development - December 2020. First review due to be presented
at the Winter 2023 pediatric subcommittee meeting
MPOG Measure Reviewers are clinical and quality improvement experts that critique our
QI Measures to ensure they stay relevant.
Review of New Literature
Appropriateness of rationale
Evaluation of inclusion/exclusion criteria
Evaluation of definition of success criteria
Recommend to modify, retire or continue measure as is
Upcoming Pediatric Research Proposals
Two pediatric research proposals will be presented to the MPOG Perioperative Clinical
Research Committee (PCRC) on Monday, August 14th
Must practice at an active MPOG site to join PCRC meetings
PCRC 0145 Intraoperative Antiemetics - DESCRIPTIVE analysis (Dr. Lucy Everett)
PCRC 0180 Intraoperative Antiemetics and PONV - OUTCOMES analysis (Dr. Ben Andrew)
TEMP-04-Peds Measure Update: Vikas O’Reilly -Shah (Seattle Children’s/MPOG Pediatric Subcommittee
Co-Chair)
Initial publish date: April 2020; Reviewed and presented to Peds committee March 2023
Success: median core/near core body temperature > 36C (96.8F)
Time period: Patient in room Patient out of room
Exclusions: Patients 18yo, ASA 5 & 6, cases < 30 minutes, cases without a temperature
route documented, Labor epidurals, Cardiac procedures, MRI, MAC/Sedation cases
Provider Attribution: Provider present for the longest duration of the case (per staff role)
Thank you for your feedback! - 23 Survey responses
Majority vote to exclude:
GI cases
Cases where patients baseline temperature was < 35.5C or > 38C
No real consensus on:
Case duration definition (room duration vs. procedure duration)
Excluding short duration cases (30 min vs. 60 min)
Hyperthermia metric
Measure success criteria
DISCUSSION:
Brad Taicher (MPOG Pediatric Subcommittee Co-Chair, Duke)- will bring this back to get a
decision on what to do moving forward.
Quality Committee Update Brad Taicher (Duke Children’s/MPOG Pediatric Subcommittee Chair)
Hyperglycemia (includes patients 12y)
GLU 01, 03: Cases with glucose > 200 mg/dL with administration of insulin or lab recheck
within 90 minutes.
GLU 05: Cases with glucose > 200 mg/dL with administration of insulin within 90
minutes.
QC Vote: Modify, Change threshold to 180 mg/dL; Support for a recheck only measure
Hypoglycemia
GLU 02, 04: Percentage of cases with glucose < 60 mg/dL with administration of dextrose
or lab recheck within 90 minutes.
QC Vote: Modify, Change threshold to 70 mg/dL; Reduce time to recheck/treat
hypoglycemia
DISCUSSION:
Ruchika Gupta (University of Michigan): Conducted a study about 10 years ago, checking
glucose in all pediatric patients (neonate - 18 years old, majority were 3 years and
younger) and found that though checking glucose is reasonable, would not recommend
treating all hyperglycemia values as patient response to insulin is somewhat
unpredictable in the pediatric population and the risk of hypoglycemia presents as a
patient safety issue.
Meridith Wade (MPOG Pediatric Program Manager) -Hyperglycemia measures
include patients greater than or equal to 12 years of age. Hypoglycemia
measures include all ages.
Nirav Shah (MPOG Quality Director)- These were some of the first measures we
implemented at MPOG and with the last Quality Committee review, are now looking to
align with hospital policies and national guidelines.
Brad Taicher (MPOG Pediatric Subcommittee Co-Chair, Duke) - When we rolled these
measures out at Duke, we started at 200 to achieve buy-in and I think it makes sense to
now move to 180 to align with national guidelines.
Nirav Shah (MPOG Quality Director)- having a broad suite of measures would make it
likely for sites to pick and choose what would work for them.
Brad Taicher (MPOG Pediatric Subcommittee Co-Chair, Duke) will speak with staff to see
how they are using these measures currently.
Oral Morphine Equivalency (OME) Measure Review
Calculated using opioids given between anesthesia start and anesthesia end for each
case. This value is normalized to patient weight (kg) and duration of anesthetic
(anesthesia end anesthesia start, hours as a decimal).
QC Vote: Modify - Widen time frame to include PACU OR create separate measure for
OME in PACU
DISCUSSION:
Brad Taicher (MPOG Pediatric Subcommittee Co-Chair, Duke): One way to use
these measures is to compare institutional performance to other institutions to
obtain some idea of current benchmarks. How are other sites using these
metrics?
Nirav Shah (ASPIRE Quality Director): That is one way to use these OME
measures - the other way sites are using these metrics to see if any
individual providers prove to be high (or low) outliers
RJ Ramamurthi (Stanford)- Is valuable to see this on the dashboard.
James Xie (Stanford) - We created an opioid use dashboard at Stanford:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942721/ Another
question that has come up is if this data could (or should) be used as a
signal for opioid diversion? How would you deal with extreme outlier
providers?
Brad Taicher (MPOG Pediatric Subcommittee Co-Chair, Duke) - a lot to
unpack there. We use different software to look at use per provider. But
an interesting thought to use MPOG data for diversion activity.
Discharge from PACU opioid use - way to identify how much pain meds
you get in PACU is due to nursing preference.
Interest in a separate PACU opioid equivalency measure for pediatrics? or
combine with intraop?
Lucy Everett (MGH): I think it would be great to include PACU data but
would want to be able to break out intraop vs. PACU OME use.
Brad Taicher (MPOG Pediatric Subcommittee Co-Chair, Duke):
Agree! I think a filter to show intraop vs. PACU vs. periop would
be excellent!
Ben Andrews (Duke) - Alternatively, separating them but also including a
metric comparing them (PACU to intraop OME ratio or something
similar) could be informative
Would displaying the 'score' as morphine IV equivalency be more valuable for
peds?
Brad Taicher (MPOG Pediatric Subcommittee Co-Chair, Duke)- Please
clarify what the change would mean.
Meridith Wade (MPOG Pediatric Program Manager) - currently
displayed as oral equivalents but can change to IV if more
helpful.
Ruchik Sharma (Univ. of Virginia): IV morphine
James Xie (Stanford): IV morphine equivalents would be more readily
relatable
Charles Schrock (WashU): If equivalence is indeed reliably calculable,
maybe the dashboard can toggle to whatever norm the user wants, oral
or IV, with morphine, hydromorphone, or fentanyl as the calculated
standard
Additional OME cohorts of interest for pediatrics?
Brad Taicher (Duke) - Cardiac could be an area of interest.
Ruchik Sharma (Univ. of Virginia) : Pectus
James Xie (Stanford) and Ruchika Gupta (University of
Michigan): Agree!
Antibiotic Timing Measure Discussion: ABX-02-peds
Background
Proposed by subcommittee in previous call for measure’ surveys
Plan to include in future SSI measure bundle/dashboard
Allows comparison of antibiotic timing adherence with SSI outcomes for sites who
submit NSQIP-p data
Currently refining MPOG microbiology data extract - future measures to include
antibiotic susceptibility
Description: Percentage of patients < 18 years old with documentation of antibiotic
administration initiated before surgical incision.
Measure Time Period: - 3 hours Procedure Start 30 minutes
Inclusions: Patients < 18 year of age
Exclusions
ASA 6
Patients 18 years of age
Procedure Type List: *see below
Emergency Cases
Antibiotics not indicated for procedure. Defined as one of the following:
Patients given IV antibiotic treatment > 3 hrs prior to Procedure Start/Incision
Case returns value code 0, 2, or 3 for ABXNotes
0 - Not ordered/Indicated per surgeon
2 - Patient on scheduled antibiotics/documented infection
3 - Not administered for medical reasons
Procedure Type List: Same procedures excluded from NSQIP-p Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis
DISCUSSION:
Ruchik Sharma (UVA) - Please elaborate on MPOG/NSQIP merger.
Brad Taicher (MPOG Pediatric Subcommittee Co-Chair, Duke) - Sites can upload
NSQIP data to MPOG and look at outcomes data.
(MPOG Pediatric Program Manager) - We are working to get
Meridith Wade
the congenital heart registry for adults up and running and work out any kinks
before opening up to Peds.
Meeting Concluded @ 1651